Türkiye Prefabrik Birliği | Sayı: 143

MAKALE BETON PREFABRİKASYON TEMMUZ 2022 ◆ SAYI : 143 22 formansını önemli ölçüde artırabilmek- tedir (yerinde dökme birleşime göre en az %178.38 daha yüksek süneklik). (5) ACPH ’li numunelerin enerji tüket- me kapasitesinin de yerinde dökme numuneye göre daha iyi olduğu gö- rülmüştür. ACPH ’li numunelerde ger- çekleşen en büyük eşdeğer viskoz sö- nüm oranı, yerinde dökme birleşimde gerçekleşen değerin iki katından daha büyük olmuştur. KAYNAKLAR [1] Eom T-S, Park H-G, Hwang H-J, Kang S-M. Plastic Hinge Relocation Methods for Emu- lative PC Beam-Column Con- nections. J Struct Eng 2015; 142:04015111. [2] Elsanadedy HM, Al-Salloum YA, Alrubaidi MA, Almusallam TH, Siddiqui NA, Abbas H. Upgrading of precast RC beam-column jo- ints using innovative FRP/steel hybrid technique for progressi- ve collapse prevention. Constr Build Mater 2021; 268:121130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.con- buildmat.2020.121130. [3] Elsanadedy HM, Al-Salloum YA, Alrubaidi MA, Almusallam TH, Abbas H. Finite element analysis for progressive collap- se potential of precast concrete beam-to-column connections strengthened with steel pla- tes. Journal of Building. En- gineering. 2021; 34:101875. h t t ps : / / do i . o r g / 10 . 1016 / j . jobe.2020.101875. [4] Dinh Han N, Hong W-K, Kim J. Strain evolution of L-shaped precast columns spliced by laminated metal plates, part I. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building. Engineering. 2021. [5] Breccolotti M, Gentile S, Tom- masini M, Materazzi AL, Bonfigli MF, Pasqualini B, et al. Beam- column joints in continuous RC frames: Comparison between cast-insitu and precast soluti- ons. Eng Struct 2016; 127:129– 44. [6] Ma C, Wang D, Wang Z. Seis- mic retrofitting of full-scale RC interior beam-column slab su- bassemblies with CFRP wraps. Compos Struct 2017; 159:397– 409. [7] Jiang H, Shao T, Fang Z, Xiao J, Hu Z. Shear-friction beha- vior of grooved constructi- on joints between a precast UHPC girder and a cast-in-pla- ce concrete slab. Eng Struct 2021; 228:111610. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j. engstru- ct.2020.111610. [8] Gou S, Ding R, Fan J, Nie X, Zhang J. Seismic performan- ce of a novel precast concrete beam-column connection using low-shrinkage engineered ce- mentitious composites. Constr Build Mater 2018; 192:643–56. [9] Esmaeeli E, Barros JAO, Sena- Cruz J, Varum H, Melo J. As- sessment of the efficiency of prefabricated hybrid composite plates (HCPs) for retrofitting of damaged interior RC beam- column joints. Compos Struct 2015; 119:24–37. [10] Zhang Yu, Li B, Li Z, Ma G, Liu Y. Seismic performance of in- terior beam-column joints in reinforced glazed hollow bead insulation concrete frames. Eng Struct 2021; 228:111494. htt- ps:/ /doi.org/10.1016/j.engstru- ct.2020.111494. [11] Zhang G, Han Q, Xu K, Du X, He W. Experimental investigati- on of seismic behavior of UH- PC-filled socket precast bridge column-foundation connection with shear keys. Eng Struct 2021; 228:111527. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j. engstru- ct.2020.111527. [12] Ye M, Jiang J, Chen HM, Zhou HY, Song DD. Seismic behavior of an innovative hybrid beam- column connection for precast concrete structures. Eng Stru- ct 2021; 227:111436. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.engstru- ct.2020.111436. [13] Won D, Seo J, Park W-S, Kim S. Torsional behavior of pre- cast segment module joints for submerged floating tunnels. Ocean Eng 2021; 220:108490. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ocea- neng.2020.108490. [14] Wang H, Marino EM, Pan P, Liu H, Nie X. Experimental study of a novel precast prestressed reinforced concrete beam-to- column joint. Eng Struct 2018; 156:68–81. [15] Wan Ge, Zhang D, Fleischman RB, Naito CJ. A coupled conne- ctor element for nonlinear static pushover analysis of precast concrete diaphragms. Eng Stru- ct 2015; 86:58–71. [16] Cheok G, Stone WC, Kunnath SK. Seismic response of precast concrete frames with hybrid connections. ACI Struct J 1998; 95:527–38. [17] Morgen BG, Kurama YC. Seismic Design of Friction-Damped Pre- cast Concrete Frame Structures. Journal of Structural Enginee- ring-asce 2007;133(11):1501– 11.