19 / 64
MAKALE
BETON PREFABRİKASYON
NİSAN 2015
◆
SAYI : 114
17
rın güvenilir olup olmadıklarının tespit
edilmesi önemlidir ve bu noktada tah-
ribatsız muayene yöntemleri pek çok
avantajları sayesinde kullanılabilir.
KAYNAKÇA
1. Mathy, B., Demars, P., Roisin, F., Wou-
ters, M. 1996. Investigation and stren-
gthening of twenty damaged bridges: A
Belgium case history, Proceedings of the
3rd International Conference on Bridge
Management. London, pp. 658-666.
2. Woodward, R.J 1981. Conditions wit-
hin duct in pots-tensioned prestressed
concrete bridges. Laboratory Report 980,
TRRL.
3. Ohtsu, M. and Watanabe, T. 2002. Stack
Imaging of Spectral Amplitudes Based on
Impact-Echo for Flaw Detection. NDT&E
International. Vol. 35. pp 189-196.
4. Alver, N., Tokai, M., Nakai, Y. and Oht-
su, M. 2007. Identification of Imperfectly-
Grouted Tendon-Duct in Concrete by SIBIE
Procedure. NDT for Safety, Prague, Czech
Republic, November 07-09, pp 9-14.
5. Ata, N., Mihara, S. and Ohtsu, M. 2007.
Imaging of Ungrouted Tendon Ducts in
Prestressed Concrete by Improved SIBIE.
NDT&E International. Vol. 40. pp 258-264.
6. Alver, N., Tokai, M., Nakai, Y. and Oht-
su, M. 2007. Identification of Imperfectly-
Grouted Tendon-Duct in Concrete by SIBIE
Procedure. NDT for Safety. November 07-
09, 2007, Prague, Czech Republic.
7. Gorzelanczyk, T., Sadowski, L. and Sc-
habowicz, K. Non-Destructive Evaluation
of the Concrete Prefabricated Pile Length
Using Impulse Response S’Mash. Institute
of Building Engineering, Wroclaw Univer-
sity of Technology.
8. Sack, D. A. and Olson, L. D., P. E. Impa-
ct Echo Testing of In-Sıtu Precast Concrete
Cylinder Pipe. Olson Engineering.
9. Schickert, M., Krause, M. and Müller, W.
2003. Ultrasonic Imaging of Concrete Ele-
ments Using Reconstruction by Synthetic
Aperture Focusing Technique. Journal of
Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE.
10. Mayer, K., Langenberg, K. J., Krause,
M., Milmann, B. and Mielentz, F. 2008.
Characterization of Reflector Types by
Phase-Sensitive Ultrasonic Data Proces-
sing and Imaging. J Nondestruct Eval. Vol.
27. pp 35-45.
11. Krause, M., Milmann, B., Schickert, M.
and Mayer, K. 2006. Investigation of Ten-
don Ducts by Means of Ultrasonic Echo
Methods: A Comparative Study. ECNDT
2006 – Tu.3.2.1.
12. Iyer, S., Schokker, A. J. and Sinha, S.
K. 2002. Ultrasonic Imaging–A Novel Way
to Investigate Corrosion Status in Post-
Tensioned Concrete Members. Journal of
Indian Institute of Science. Vol. 82. pp
197–217.
13. Hugenschmidt, J. 2002. Concrete Bri-
dge Inspection with a Mobile GPR System.
Construction and Building Materials. Vol.
16. Issue 3. pp 147-154.
14. Spraggs, K. R., Sneed, L. H., Belarbi,
A. and Anderson, N.L. 2012. Field Investi-
gation of Spalling in Partial-Depth Precast
Concrete Bridge Decks Using Nondestruc-
tive Testing. PCI Journal. pp 80-93.
15. Grosse, C. U. and Ohtsu, M. 2008.
Acoustic Emission Testing, Basics for Re-
search Applications in Civil Engineering,
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
16. Cullington, D. W., MacNeil, D., Paul-
son, P. and Elliott, J. 2001. Continuous
Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Grouted
Post-Tensioned Concrete Bridges. NDT&E
International. Vol. 34. pp 95-105.
17. Fricker, S. and Vogel, T. 2007. Site
Installation and Testing of a Continuous
Acoustic Monitoring. Construction and Bu-
ilding Materials. Vol. 21. pp 501-510.
18. Nair, A. and Cai, C. S. 2010. Acoustic
Emission Monitoring of Bridges: Review
and Case Studies. Engineering Structures
32. pp 1704-1714.
Şekil 14.
Hareketli yük etkisi altındaki köprülerin hasarlarının uzaktan AE tekniği ile görüntülenmesi (Nair ve Cai, 2010)